Dr. Imants Barušs analyzes concepts often thought of as intangible or spiritual. One hears talk of a person’s energy field, the ability of one person’s energy field to influence another’s, and other such phenomena. But how much of it is in a person’s mind and how much of it physically exists?
While Dr. Barušs, a psychology professor at the University of Western Ontario, does not comprehensively or definitively answer this question, his recent study begins to bring the issue into focus. He is the lead author of a paper titled “Alterations of Consciousness at a Self-Development Seminar: A Matrix Energetics Seminar Survey,” published in the November 2014 issue of the Journal of Consciousness Exploration Research.
In this paper, he reported on a couple of experiments related to the power of consciousness.
In two experiments, Barušs directed his thoughts at people from afar to see if those people could feel anything. He focused on the effect these thoughts had on subjects’ energy levels, whether they felt more energized or more fatigued than usual.
He tested a total of 37 participants, arranging times with them via email in which he would conduct these sessions. The participants would ensure they were not driving at these times, and they would also monitor how they felt at these times. Barušs flipped a coin at the beginning of each session to determine randomly whether he would perform remote influencing or do nothing.
It is more than 95 percent likely he had an influence on their energy state
He also monitored his own level of concentration and “the depth of his altered state of consciousness.” It seems when the depth of his altered state was greater, the participants were more likely to feel fatigued. He found it probable that the remote influencing did have an effect on the participants (his result was p < .05, which means it is less than 5 percent likely that their change in energy level was due to chance rather than his influence; in other words, it is more than 95 percent likely he had an influence on their energy state).
The results should be taken as an interesting starting point, but Barušs cautioned that the results may change if more points of comparison are made.
Matrix Energetics is a practice in which one person allegedly affects another with subtle energies directed by intention. Barušs summarized some of the effects as detailed by another researcher, Jos Marlowe at the Institute of Transpersonal Psychology: “Participants sometimes experience various somatic sensations, including falling down, and that reality has become more plastic so that improbable events are more likely to occur, such as the spontaneous remission of disease.”
“All of these events should be more carefully examined, and we try to make a beginning at doing so in this study,” he wrote. His experiments were conducted at a Matrix Energetics conference in Philadelphia, Penn., in 2012. A variety of participants were involved, from healthcare professionals to engineers to gas station attendants. For the majority, it was their first time participating in Matrix Energetics.
Barušs and his fellow researchers had the participants fill out surveys before the seminar, soon after the experience, and then two months later, to see the short-term and long-term changes they reported in physical and mental health. He used some standard psychology tests to assess their mental and emotional states, including the RAND 36-Item Health Survey.
According to the follow-up survey results, the overall health of the participants improved in the long-term (p = .002, meaning it is 99.8 percent likely the reported health improvements were due to the Matrix Energetics seminar). Again, however, Baruss suggested caution in interpreting the results. “The alterations of consciousness experienced in the context of Matrix Energetics should be further investigated,” he wrote. He also noted: “For the purposes of this study, no effort is made to distinguish ME [Matrix Energetics] from non-specific factors such as social interactions with like-minded individuals, suggestion, listening to a charismatic speaker, and so on. Teasing those out would require separate studies.”
Read More: Here