Plants use an underground communication network to exchange chemical warnings, according to a new study.
Work by a team of biologists at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences has provided new insights into the complex subterranean life of seemingly immobile corn plants.
The work adds to a body of research exploring the chemical pathways that plants use to “talk” to each other.
“Our study demonstrated that changes induced by above ground mechanical contact between plants can affect below ground interactions, acting as cues in prediction of the future competitors,” said Dr Velemir Ninkovic, lead author of the study.
Plants are known to communicate via touch. Trees, for example, tend to stop growing outwards when they make contact with their neighbours’ branches.
However, the mechanisms by which plants signal using touch are poorly understood, and Dr Ninkovic and his colleagues wanted to find out whether the answers could be found underground.
In recent years scientists have begun to disentangle the complex communication system that links plants together.
Science news in pictures
Unlike animals, plants do not have nervous systems and so cannot communicate using rapid electrical signals.
Instead, their signalling both within their bodies and with neighbours consists of the relatively slow exchange of chemical messages.
Some of this communication takes place via strands of underground fungi that plants use to share food, warning signals and even toxic chemicals – a phenomenon that some biologists have informally termed the “wood-wide web”.
In the study by Dr Ninkovic and his colleagues, they wanted to investigate whether chemicals released directly into the soil by stressed plants could change the behaviour of their neighbours.
The researchers began by applying a soft brush to corn seedlings, a touch that could represent any number of nearby stresses, including new plants encroaching on their territory or a plant-eating animal nibbling on their leaves.
New seedlings were then transferred into the same growing material as the recently touched plants to see if their growth was affected – the theory being that plants touched by the brush would have left chemical traces in the soil documenting their experience.
The scientists found that the fresh seedlings responded by growing more leaves and fewer roots than plants that had grown under normal conditions.